top of page

Negated Ifs in Amsterdam

  • Writer: Malte Willer
    Malte Willer
  • Nov 1, 2019
  • 1 min read

This year's Amsterdam Colloquium will see me present my paper "Negating Conditionals in Bilateral Semantics." Here is the abstract:

A recurring narrative in the literature on conditionals is that the empirical facts about negated ifs provide compelling evidence for the principle of Conditional Excluded Middle and sit uncomfortably with a large family of analyses of conditionals as universal quantifiers over possible worlds. I show that both parts of the narrative are in need of a rewrite. I do so by articulating an innovative conditional analysis in a bilateral semantic setting that takes inspiration from the Ramsey test for conditionals but distinguishes the classical Ramseyan question of what it takes to accept a conditional from the one of what it takes to reject a conditional. The resulting framework disentangles the empirical facts about negated conditionals from the validity of Conditional Excluded Middle but also shows how the principle can live happily in a strict analysis of conditionals, and in fact how it can co-exist with other non-classical principles such as Simplification of Disjunctive Antecedents without negative side effects.

Recent Posts

See All
Subjectivity

My overview article on subjectivity has now appeared in print, in The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Language, along with...

 
 
Chicago Area Philosophy Exchange

There is an exciting new iniative here at UChicago Phil: the Chicago Area Philosophy Exchange (CAPHE). Its goal is to foster...

 
 
Credences for Strict Conditionals

My long-in-the-making attempt at explaining how proponents of a strict analysis of conditionals can make sense of probabilities of...

 
 

©2009–2025 Malte Willer. All rights reserved.

[Imprint]

bottom of page