top of page

Can at the Central

  • Writer: Malte Willer
    Malte Willer
  • Feb 17, 2018
  • 1 min read

Next week I will present my "Two Puzzles about Agentive Can" at the Central APA in Chicago (Thursday February 22, 12:10-2:10). David Boylan and Paul Portner have kindly agreed to comment. Here is the abstract:

I discuss two puzzling observations about how agentive can differs from other existential modals, most prominently epistemic might and deontic may: (i) the former, but not the latter, exhibit a tendency to resist distribution over disjunction; (ii) the negation of the latter, but not of the former, brings in its wake a commitment to the corresponding necessity of a negation. These observations call for an explanation by a modal analysis that satisfies two methodological constraints: (i) existential modals of all flavors (deontic, epistemic, agentive, telic, and so on) should receive a uniform semantic analysis; (ii) features that all existential modals have in common, such as their tendency to license free choice effects, should receive a uniform semantic or pragmatic explanation. I provide such an analysis in a framework that combines tools and techniques from dynamic and inquisitive semantics with insights from the literature on the role of agency in deontic logic.

Recent Posts

See All
Subjectivity

My overview article on subjectivity has now appeared in print, in The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy of Language, along with...

 
 
Chicago Area Philosophy Exchange

There is an exciting new iniative here at UChicago Phil: the Chicago Area Philosophy Exchange (CAPHE). Its goal is to foster...

 
 
Credences for Strict Conditionals

My long-in-the-making attempt at explaining how proponents of a strict analysis of conditionals can make sense of probabilities of...

 
 

©2009–2025 Malte Willer. All rights reserved.

[Imprint]

bottom of page